North Precinct Meeting: "Rosie's wanted to close North Precinct since she got in."
SENTINEL NEWS SERVICE~ Jason Kaplan, Cornelius Swart: See online poll
Jan 28 -“I think Rosie’s wanted to close North Precinct since she got in,” said Sgt. Ron Berry, a 25-year veteran of North Portland’s signature police station, about Police Chief Rosie Sizer. “I don’t know why. But now it looks like she’s got an excuse.”
Sergeant Berry stood outside the Kenton Firehouse this evening as Portland Police Bureau officials and about 70 neighbors met this evening to hear a PPB proposal that would cut both North and Southeast Precincts in order to save money during the current city budget crisis.
The officer was admittedly upset about the latest proposal to close the precinct. “I wanted to retire out of that precinct. I’ve been over to Northeast. I like it here.”
The officer was an outspoken opponent in 2007 when Sizer attempted to close the precinct under then-Mayor Tom Potter. “You got to speak up for yourself or she’ll roll right over you,” said Berry. “Right now it seems pretty sedate in there.”
Inside the firehouse, North Precinct Commander Donna Henderson was present. The proposed details were outlined by Assistant Police Chief Brian Martinek. A number of North Portland activists were in attendance, including representatives from University Park, St Johns, Piedmont, Kenton and the St Johns Boosters.
The proposal call for the closing of the two precincts. North Precinct would be converted to the offices for the PPB training division and Southeast Precinct would become the new traffic division headquarters. The total number of Neighborhood Response Officers for the district would go down from 20 to 15.
"In 1994 we had three precincts and we went up to five," said Martinek. "We didn't have any extra resources to add to the precincts at the time. We've suffered a number of different problems since then and we've never really recovered from them."
Martinek said that this proposal would reduce overhead, and force some demotions that would have a net result of putting as many as 20 officers back on the street.
Neighbors were markedly sedate, even though many have all ready responded to the new proposal with a mixture of concern and incredulity. The PPB is responding to requests from the council to reduce budget expenditures by all bureaus by up to 5 percent. The PPB currently makes up 30 percent of the City budget.
“What do you hear from the front line officers?" asked one neighbor.
"They're human beings," responded Martinek. "They're unhappy about it. But they see the sense in it as well."
Berry, for one, does not see the sense. "They could close the traffic division and put those guys in all the precincts and save money that way."
However, when asked directly Martinek stated that a traffic division closure would only save $250,000. "It wouldn't come close. But we studied that idea."
Other neighbor reactions and questions were:
Community activist Pam Arden said that she felt that North Portland was very connected to their precinct and that “we will be losing something” when the precincts are redistricted.
Martinek responded “It's a different time” and explained that with the mobile computers carried by police officers in their cars, they are not as dependent on the physical location of the precinct building since they track calls remotely.
St John's Neighborhood Chair Thomas Ebert asked if this proposal was more driven by efficiency than money. He also expressed frustration over what he called a “lack of transparency” with how the proposal was formulated.
Martinek responded that he would personally take responsibility for any lack of transparency and for not having more specific information on the web site. He said that the this all happened so quickly they may not have gotten information out as well as they should have. “We don't control our destiny, we get direction from the city.” To answer Ebert's first question Martinek said “Efficiency is money. We are trying save people's jobs.” And that this proposal was designed to keep as many police on the job as possible.
One man asked if PPB was told that they did not need to reduce their budget, would they not make these changes.
Martinek answered “If we had no cut we would still propose this (redistricting plan).” He later explained that this was because of the current state of the economy. If the things were to turn around and revenue were stable they would not make this proposal. “The last thing Chief Sizer and I want to do is have this conversation again.”
After Assistant Chief Martinek finished taking question, the police provided attending community members with several kinds of pizza from Sparky's. Many people stayed and chatted with the officers. The tone seemed more cordial than two years ago and more resigned. The reality of the current revenue shortfalls seemed to create a sense of inevitability that was lacking the last time precinct merging was proposed.
Asked for her reaction to the presentation, Kenton community activist Doretta Schrock said that she wanted details such as what the new supervision ratio will be and what the command structure will look like. “These things are important, and they haven't given us this information.”


Comments
Tighten those belts fatties...
by Sentinel Reader/User | Sun, 02/01/2009 - 12:38pmIn 1999, Seattle police adopted an environmental management plan, which not only saves them money, but also helps keep our air and landfills cleaner! Maybe the PPB thinks they can get where they are going faster now, in their shiny new cars, so they don't have to be based as close to where they are really needed. I'm just waiting to hear about how a police cruiser going too fast, crashes into some innocent bystander...
Check this link for more info about our Police Bureau!!!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portland_Police_Bureau
~A concerned, tax-paying Citizen
Poor management. That pretty much sums up our local boys in blues current "crisis". They have talked about closing the North Precinct for quite some time now. There is even a post about it on Wikapedia!!! Isn't it ironic how you see all these supped-up new Dodge Chargers zooming around our streets at 50+ miles an hour? Yet they don't have enough money to keep the doors open? Who approved acquisition of these $35,000 hot rods? Supposedly "With the current city budget projecting a $3 million to $10 million shortfall before June", couldn't they have found a more economical, greener, or maybe cheaper vehicle? Not such a gas-guzzler!?! Come on, we have cops on foot, bikes, skates, motorcycles, horses, 4 wheelers, giant SUV's, tactical assault vehicles, and a couple of huge RV command centers. The Portland Police Bureau even currently owns three planes. How much do they spend on gas in a year? Why not a few green vehicles instead of these muscle cars that get 15 miles per gallon? How often do people really get away in a police chase? They have radios and cameras all over the city streets... why do we need high-speed pursuits in our residential neighborhoods. Is it just intimidation tactics? Or do they really just NEED a Hemi?
Portland Police Vehicles
by Sentinel Reader/User | Mon, 02/02/2009 - 10:09pmWe as line officers had no say in what kind of new police vehicles the city bought. The new Chargers are fast and they really do use up the gas. Plus it is hard to get in and out of the back seat. There are a lot of things the City could change in reguards to Fleet Services that could save the tax payers millions !
NoPo Precinct
by Sentinel Reader/User | Sat, 01/31/2009 - 4:34pmFrankly the level of service in NoPo isn't that great to begin with. Community policing in St. Johns has been disappointing since I've been here. Their presence, mostly fellt at the Starbucks on Lombard, has not disuaded crime or vandalism. Ditching the brand new Dodge Charger cruisers and adopting a few bicycle units would do the community much more in the way of face to face communication/ relationship building AND save money.
APATHY RULES
by Sentinel Reader/User | Thu, 01/29/2009 - 5:37pmThe glum faces in the firehouse last night were equally matched by the police at the front of the room, except for Asst Chief Brian. A very smooth and calm voice explained the reasons why the former home of North Precinct was going to change into a business office for the bureau's training personnel. Questions from the assembled minions of the North, were largely about details of the plan and what the loss of it would mean to various groups.
Apparently, everyone in the room had been personally impacted by some aspect of the present economy and were pleased to find that the police force indeed intended to keep on doing their work despite being fiscally cut to the bone. Indeed Brian indicated that the latest info out of the budget office was that all agencies should cut 5%, not the 2.5% this plan represents, and that some of the city council were concerned that PPB couldn't maintain service at those numbers.
Well - Duh!
We can perhaps infer from that, the dim bulbs sitting on the council in fact recognize that cutting essential service like police and fire is not such a brilliant strategy after all. Yes, it is certainly fare to ask ALL the bureaus to "kick the tires" of their budgets as Sam puts it, but you have to wonder why PPB didn't just say - "we're as low as we can go without the thin blue line breaking." What council member would INSIST that the only core services this city govenment delivers (other than Mayoral Drama) must cut its own budget. The first 911 call or police response that could not be done because of lack of dollars to make it happen would have the head of that council member on it.
To be fair to the citizens of this city, (not the bureaucrats) there has to be rational thinking about having cut all the other avenues of spending the city has before coming to the police with a knife to their budget.
Send an email to the Fat Fannies at City Hall and demand the police budget be removed from cuts and that the current precincts be retained as they are now structured.
Post new comment